{"id":972,"date":"2026-06-08T02:29:14","date_gmt":"2026-06-08T06:29:14","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2026-06-08T02:29:14","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T06:29:14","slug":"mortgaged-loan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/c2creset.ondigit.us\/?p=972","title":{"rendered":"Mortgaged Loan"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mortgage ‘Loan’ from a Bank<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

"The entire taxing and monetary systems are hereby
\nplaced under the U.C.C.<\/span><\/a> (Uniform Commercial Code)" <\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966
\n(Federal tax is often a voluntary tax!<\/span>)<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Aside from the Promissory Note, the Mortgage Agreement with your bank is a fraud and the bank perpetuates that fraud by nondisclosure. After you decipher all of the legal wording, most standard Mortgage Agreements contain the following:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

You, the Principal, the buyer of the home, brings to the mortgage agreement (NO contract) the most important thing, your good credit, and you sign a promissory note, and a fee-simple deed, which, actually, just paid for your property in full.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Now the bank puts before you another form, and you sign this without knowing that you signed a Rental Agreement, allowing the bank to "service" the account for the next 30 years with you as the tenant. All the bank brought to the agreement is the people to service the account.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

You came into the mortgage agreement being both the "renter" and the "Principal" and their job is to collect the principal and interest from you, the "renter", and return it to the "Principal." That’s you. Did they disclose this in simple terms? No, then this is where the fraud came in.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

You give them a monthly mortgage payment check (a ‘rent’ check) and they’re supposed to give the money right back to you. The fraud is that they don’t return the "principal and interest" back to the "Principal" (you) as per their agreement!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In the 20th century our legal system was converted from common law to commercial law by the bankers. They have to pretend there is equal protection under the law and that there is no involuntary servitude. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

So they use legal wording to cover the true meaning of every agreement you enter into! By using legalese the Banks can say "we offered you equal protection," and they will state they gave you full disclosure without lying or stealing anything. But did they really?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Do you know how to decipher their legalese code<\/span><\/a>? So we read or don’t read the agreement but due to our advisors, loan officers, attorneys, moms and dads, teachers and overall societal conditioning, we believe we owe this money. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

We just say that “it makes sense.” We pay it because we believe through ignorance, misunderstanding and less than full disclosure that we owe this money, yet the agreement does not say this!<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (R-OH) Chairman of the House Banking and Finance Committee brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank (established and owned by the Morgan, Rothchild, Rockefeller, Warburg, etc. Cabal in 1913, at the end of the 2nd Industrial Revolution), The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, FRAUD, CONSPIRACY, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

To protect themselves from these charges both the House and the Senate passed House Joint Resolution 192, on June 5, 1933. It provided that the people, who had delivered their gold<\/span><\/a> to the federal government following an illegal proclamation by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their substance, had been taken from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The basis of debt elimination derives from HJR-192 in which the Corporate US board of directors, the Congress, removed from the flesh and blood men and women of the several united States of America their substance with which they can pay for things and replaced it with fictitious "money" in the form of debt instruments called Federal Reserve Notes. This created the exemption.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Essentially, the debt elimination process obtains access to the trust account that the federal government has been using since your birth to monetize and pay off the national debt. They automatically made the government the trustee of that account and used your energy and talent to fund the national government. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

With your birth certificate sent from the state in which you were born, the Department of Treasury creates a constructive trust account that permits the corporate United States and all of the other subsidiary corporations, states, counties, cities, etc. to interact with you as a corporate, fictitious entity. They are fictitious public entities that cannot interact with you, the real, living person. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

But they have convinced you, the living flesh and blood individual that they are referring to you. You have voluntarily accommodated this interaction on behalf of your fictitious entity, your "corporation."<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

By filing your UCC-1<\/span><\/a> financial statement, security agreement, negotiable bill of exchange and the Federal Reserve routing numbers with the fictitious corporate government entities, you separate yourself from that accommodation and take the position as the first creditor to that debtor. The debt belongs to the Corporate entity.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

You, but the real you has been making the payments. Now you will stand first in line to utilize the collateral held in your trust account by the government. Using this trust account as they have done, you can assign credit to the bank at which you, the fictitious entity, owe the debt. A simple transaction discharges that debt. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Who can now complain that the debt is not satisfied? You have done what you have agreed to do, but the credit did not come from your checking account. It was a non-cash transaction in the public fiction of commerce under the Uniform Commercial Code<\/span><\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

In the case of mortgage elimination, the credit in your “registered name” account is directed to redeem your note through a commercial Bill of Exchange. This credit is transferred to the bank holding your mortgage to discharge the debt. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

If the bank accepts this legal tender as per mortgage agreement, you request the reconveyance of the deed back to you. Should the bank refuse the offer of legal tender and will not discharge the debt, they are in dishonor by failing to perform according to the mortgage agreement. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As the guarantor of that mortgage you can revoke your agreement within 33 days by foreclosing on the bank. Simultaneously, you seek judicial review of the administrative procedures you have followed in accordance with pertinent statutes. <\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Even if the judge refuses to sign the order, in 6 months it is ruled in your favor by default. Should the bank refuse to reconvey the deed, a clear title is provided by transferring the property through three trusted individuals: buyer A for $10 and consideration and after 10 days sold to buyer B for $10 and consideration for another 10 days, buyer C and finally to you for $10 and consideration for 91 days, then it is recommended that the property be sold to your Corporation, or some such asset protection program in which you are established as its beneficiary. This avoids loss of property, made vulnerable to the predatory attorneys versus the new status of a property that is free and clear of debt.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Mortgaged Loan Agreement<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n